Florida’s Fourth DCA in Donovan v. Florida Peninsula Finds 2011 Statute of Limitations for Homeowners’ Insurance Claims is Not Retroactive
In Donovan v. Florida Peninsula, Florida’s Fourth DCA just issued a very important opinion for anyone unsure of the Florida statute of limitations for homeowners insurance claims.
If you have not seen them yet, you need to check out the two best pages on the site: the Florida Homeowners Insurance Statutes and the Property Insurance Blog Working Index. Combine them, and they are a guide to handling any Florida homeowners insurance claim.
In Donovan v. Florida Peninsula, Florida’s Fourth DCA recently issued a short but informative decision clarifying the statute of limitations for Florida homeowners insurance claims. Donovan’s case involved a 2005 insurance claim for hurricane damage.
The question was whether the 2011 version of Fla. Stat. 95.11(2)(e) applied to Donovan’s claim. The claim occurred and was reported to Florida Peninsula before the statute of limitations was amended. Florida Peninsula asked the Court to retroactively apply the 2011 statute of limitations to Donovan’s lawsuit. Donovan claimed that the statute was not retroactive and, as a result, she was only required to file the lawsuit within 5 years of Florida Peninsula denying the claim (which would have given her until basically the date of this article to file the lawsuit).
In 2011, Florida’s legislature changed the statute of limitations (or statute of repose) to require the homeowner to file a homeowners insurance-related lawsuit within 5 years of the date of loss. Prior to this amendment, Florida courts would give the homeowner five years from the date that he alleged the breach of the contract occurred. In other words, according to the old statute of limitations, the homeowner could presumably wait 10 years to report a claim and it would not be limited because he actually had 5 years from the date the claim was allegedly denied or underpaid (of course, the prompt notice provision would prohibit that claim).
The Fourth DCA determined Fla. Stat. 95.11(2)(e)‘s 2011 statutory amendments did not apply to Donovan’s claim. Thus, Donovan did not breach the statute of limitations because she did not have to file her lawsuit within 5 years of the date of loss. Donovan had 5 years from the date Florida Peninsula breached the contract to file the lawsuit.
In addition, the Fourth DCA determined that a trial court should not dismiss a lawsuit for breach of the prompt notice provision. As you know if you read First Party Property Insurance Blog, the question of late notice cannot be determined at the pleadings stage.
If you want to see my other articles on hurricane claims and homeowners insurance, make sure to check out:
Here is a copy of the Donovan v. Florida Peninsula opinion here:
This is not rocket science. If you are going to pay attorneys millions of dollars to litigate for you, take 5% of the time expended to build simple systems to help you achieve better outcomes while spending the least. There is no reason that every attorney handling a case for a carrier should have to analyze the statute of limitations issue “from scratch.” This is a simple question requiring a simple “check the box” answer for each case.
If you want a copy of a guide that streamlines all routine questions like these, please message me.
Did this Article Answer Your Homeowners Insurance Question?
If not, please contact us.